|
|
|||||||||
|
New employment legislation in 2003 Changes that will affect every employer Giving references - the pitfalls
New employment legislation in 2003The new changes that are being introduced, we are led to believe, are to support the Government’s commitment to create a highly productive, modern and successful workplace. In our opinion what the Government has really done is create extra burdens on the already weighed down employer and instead of helping working parents it may just put employers off employing women of child bearing age.
Some of the new legislation is complex and may require employers to introduce new policies and procedures.
Increase in Compensationhe compensation which may be awarded by Employment Tribunals is reviewed annually. The following limits will be updated in February 2003 and have effect in any case where the appropriate date falls on or after 01 February 2003:
New leave rights for parents
Employers will be able to recover the SPP in the same way as SMP. Employers will be able to claim back 92% of the payments they make. Those eligible for small employers’ relief will be able to claim back 100% + an additional amount in compensation. Employers who need to, will be able to claim funding in advance for SPP from the Inland Revenue.
If you would like advice and assistants on this topic please call Lina Hogg on 01473 890037 or e-mail lina.hogg@picassohr.com
Flexible workingWho can request it? An employee who:
What can be requested?
What is the procedure?
If you are faced with such a request and would like advice and assistance we would be please to help. Contact Lina Hogg on 01473 890037 or e-mail lina.hogg@picassohr.com
Giving references - the pitfallsAn increase in cases and litigation has turned the legal spotlight on to the issue of references. All employers, irrespective of their size, will be asked to provide references at some time and it is therefore important you think carefully when preparing them. The following case law clearly shows that the reference has to give a true, accurate and fair picture. This is vitally important because the referee also has a duty of care to the receiver of the reference: follow this link for case law and guidance Batholomew v London Borough of Hackney [1999] as published in the Employment Law Journal June 1999: Mr Bartholomew was suspended by Hackney because of some alleged financial irregularities. because of this, Mr Bartholomew alleged that there had been racial discrimination and took the council to an employment tribunal. The two parties reached a compromise agreement and it was agreed that Mr Bartholomew would take 'voluntary severance' and that any disciplinary proceedings would be stopped. Mr Bartholomew was subsequently offered a job with another Council which sought a reference from Hackney. The reference stated that Mr Bartholomew had taken voluntary severance:
Because of the reference the job offer was withdrawn and Mr Bartholomew brought a case against Hackney alleging that although the reference was correct, it was unfair. The court of appeal laid down 3 principles concerning references:
In the Bartholomew case, The Court of Appeal decided Hackney was not in breach of its duty to him and his claim was dismissed.
Employees rights to a referenceAn employer is under no obligation to give a reference, except in certain sectors of activity such as the financial services or where there is an express clause in the employee’s contract (or in a settlement agreement) that the employer will do so.
Duty of careWhen giving a reference the employer has a duty of care to both the ex-employee and the recipient. The employer must use reasonable care in preparing the reference, as the information given must be true, accurate and fair. Employers who are ‘economical with the truth’ in references should be wary. Even if everything said is true, if what is left out would change the reference, it could be negligent! An employer could be excused for thinking that it may be simpler merely to confirm employment details. It is doubtful that one could call this a reference since it contains no assessment of work or character. However, as long as there is no duty to give a reference this should suffice.
Disclosure of referencesThere is some good news for employers! Generally speaking, employees do not have the right to see a reference about them unless the referee or recipient discloses it to them. Even when the Data Protection Act 1998 grants access to manual personnel files, if a referee gives a reference in confidence for employment, self employment or educational purposes, the employee will not have access to it unless the referee gives permission for its disclosure.
Practical Advice
If in doubt get advice, call us on 01473 890037
| |||||||||
|
The information in this newsletter is of a general nature and is not a substitute for professional advice. You are recommended to obtain specific professional advice before you take any action. For further information, advice or assistance on any of the matters raised in this newsletter please contact Picasso HR on 01473 890037.
Copyright Picasso HR Ltd 2002-2010. Registered in England No 4173777 Email Martin to unsubscribe from this newsletter Privacy policy. |
Home | What We Do | Our Services | Our Credentials | Our Clients | Site Map
| PicassoHR Newsletter (August, 2010) |
| Our Client Testimonials |
| Upcoming Training & Events
It's All About Face - an Intro to Face Reading Deeper understanding of the person behind the mask |
